Pets or Pests? Dealing With Companion Animals

Whether they consider themselves dog people, cat people, or exotic bird people, millions of condo residents in Florida own companion animals. Florida residents may love their furry family members but not all association boards and managers are quite as enthused about pets.

That's because with pets, can come problems, especially for those living in tight multifamily spaces. It can be difficult for condo boards and management to balance residents’ rights to keep companion animals against the impact those animals may have on value, maintenance and community relations. And it's not just a matter of personal preference; there are laws in place protecting the rights of residents, and coupled with the rules and regulations that boards and buildings may have created to protect themselves, determining which takes precedence can sometimes be a little tricky.

Know the Rules

It’s crucial for pet owners, or prospective pet owners, to understand the relevant laws for both their municipality and private community so that they aren’t taken by surprise and possibly forced to give up a pet.

Residents must also abide by laws that are specific to their counties, says Andrew Fortin, senior vice president of communications with Associa, an association management company with nine offices in Florida.

In Florida, residents cannot own any animal prohibited by federal, state or local laws—and Florida itself restricts the ownership of certain exotic pets, and separates these animals into categories. The first category includes animals that are not allowed to be kept as pets under any circumstances. This includes chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, baboons, leopards, jaguars, elephants, bears and lions. The second category covers animals, including some smaller monkeys, for which an owner must have a state-issued permit, says Fortin.

Other critters are perhaps less exotic than bears or gorillas, though no more welcome in a condo setting. For example, pitbulls are not permitted anywhere in Miami-Dade County, and many condos and HOAs also restrict ownership of livestock-type animals (such as chickens or goats), as well as certain breeds of dogs more prone to aggression.


Related Articles

Vulnerable Residents

Safety at Any Age

COVID-19 Cases Plateauing in Some Areas

Not the Time to Relax, Say Experts

Reopening Your Community

IREM Offers a Roadmap



  • Dear Cooperator Editor, I respectfully request that you run this this piece in The Cooperator, as to elicit responses to help Condo Associations like ours, Beacon Lakes Condominiums in New Port Richey, Fl.34652, regarding the increasing influx of cat owners coming into "No Pet Communities," such as ours. In researching your previous articles, I just read the article of 2/15 by Danielle Braff. It suggests Associations have rules in place for protection, that an Assoc. can have restrictions, one being the number of pets, and mentions disability issues and the force of the various federal housing and disability laws/acts.. Our Assoc. is 30-35 years old, originally incorporated as a 55+ Pet Restricted Community, and that's why owners purchased there. We re now experiencing an influx of owners coming with cats bearing doctor's notes indicating the cat/s is/are necessary "medically speaking," for comfort needs, emotional support needs, etc. Frankly, this has caused, and is causing concerns for owners who purchased, because BL's was "pet restricted." Cannot we, per "free speech," plus the fact we purchased specifically because it was "pet restricted," have a written statement included among the papers for "potential owners" to read and and therefore know, that the very large majority of owners do not want cats coming. After all, the opportunity exists to purchase where pets are welcome in very close proximity to BL's. Is the only option of those who came due no pets, to move? To this end, I provided a sample draft to the Board of Directors, who sent it to the Association lawyer, whose opinion was that it was a "retaliation against cat owners," therefore discrimination and a violation of the Fair Housing Act, and that the Board ought immediately send to all owners a letter indicating Beacon Lakes owners ought not discriminate against "disabled owners." My goodness, what about the Christian ethic of regard for one's neighbor? It is commonly known a family doctor will provide such a note merely upon request, especially when required to purchase in a "no pet community." Who in fact knows if these folks are disabled? Who in fact knows if a cat ameliorates the particular disability? Who in fact knows if the disability existed prior to coming to Beacon Lakes? In other words, has every one of the spate of owners actually had these per-existing conditions, prior to moving into BL's ? I submit this not merely as a comment, but rather a request that you run this as an article in a very soon upcoming issue of The Cooperator, to possibly help the millions of owners in the many Associations across Florida beset with this condition. Is it discriminatory to want to have the opportunity (right) to be treated fairly and respectfully? A number of our directors receive, and read The Cooperator. Ideally, some Association lawyer will see the article and indicate how we may achieve having potential owners, via a statement in out pre-purchase material, understand the thinking and feelings of the vast majority, and if that is not possible, what specific rules we can enact to tighten things up, such as determining if the condition actually existed prior to wanting to come to BL's. You could help millions with this. It just strikes me as totally unfair and insensitive that we not be permitted to have potential owners know our preference for the community as it was created. Submitted by: R. Alan Zito, PH. D. Board Director seven years, Board President five years, and resident owner 15 years at Beacon Lakes Condominiums: 3944 Lighthouse Way, New Port Richey, Fl. 34652.